I’m more used to reviewing than being
reviewed, so I’ve been awaiting coverage of our Schnittke Studies volume with some trepidation. But if this first
review is anything to go by, I needn’t have worried. It’s by Ian Power and
appears in the July 2017 issue of Tempo (Vol. 71, Issue 281, pp. 114-115). Thanks to
Ian for his sympathetic and perceptive reading. I’m particularly pleased that
his judgement throughout is framed in relation to the book’s stated aims.
I hope CUP don’t mind my reproducing
the whole review here - if anyone from
the publisher is reading this and does take issue, drop me a line and I’ll take
it down.
(just click on the text if it's too small to read)
(just click on the text if it's too small to read)
