Saturday, 24 March 2012

BBC Symphony Orchestra: Hugh Wood, Tippett, Barbican 23 March 2012

Hugh Wood: Violin Concerto No.2
Tippett: A Child of Our Time
BBC Symphony Orchestra and Chorus
Anthony Marwood violin
Nicole Cabell soprano
Karen Cargill mezzo
John Mark Ainsley tenor
Matthew Rose bass
Sir Andrew Davis conductor

A young Frenchman from an ethnic minority shooting an official in revenge for attacks on his people: given the events in Toulouse this week, Tippett's oratorio would seem as timely as its title suggests. Actually, it feels quite dated, and the opaque libretto (by the composer himself) only obscures the work's message. But then, its continuing popularity results from the power of its music, which has rarely sounded as focussed and dramatic as it did this evening.
Andrew Davis achieves a fine balance with this score, allowing the quieter passages to meander just enough to give contrast to the louder movements, which sound all the more impassioned by contrast. The BBC Symphony Chorus, fielding just about as many singers as they could squeeze onto the back of the Barbican stage, regularly upped the volume to sound like a significantly larger choir. For the most part, their ensemble and tuning were tight, and the impact of the choral singing was all the greater for the extreme dynamic contrasts between movements.
The four vocal soloists all had their individual merits, but couldn't have sounded more different to each other. That isn't really a problem – they only sing together once – but it did lead to inevitable comparisons between them. Bass Matthew Rose shone out, with his clear diction and rich powerful tone. Tenor John Mark Ainsley stood in for an indisposed Toby Spence, but he had been booked long enough to get his name in the programme, so that didn't explain his regular lapses in pitch and support. Karen Cargill gave a more solid performance of the alto part, although there isn't much of it and she did seem underemployed. Nicole Cabell's coloratura tone stood out a mile from this line-up, but added to the dramatic intensity, especially of the numbers she sang with the chorus.
Given the driving and continuously intense performances that have become standard from London orchestras in recent years, the stoical reserve behind much of this performance seemed like something of the throwback. It was certainly welcome though, and Tippett's score benefited from the controlled and only occasionally impassioned reading. Hugh Wood's Second Violin Concerto, here receiving its London première, is a similar case. There's nothing flashy or virtuosic about this score. It is well written, with effective although unsophisticated orchestration. The solo part emphasises linear and melodic integrity over showmanship, but seems to borrow heavily from the Berg Concerto. The composer is known for the accessibility of his music, so it was a surprise to hear so much serial technique, but for the most part this score inhabits an impressionist or perhaps gently expressionist aesthetic. It is no great revelation in terms of the recent history of the violin concerto (and it pales in comparison with Brett Dean's Concerto played by the same orchestra last Saturday) but its attractive enough.
Anthony Marwood put in an excellent performance. There isn't really much here to challenge him technically, and he could easily have given a condescending reading of this relatively straightforward music. But he is clearly convinced of its merits and communicated them effectively. His playing was precise and controlled, but never cold, and the score's mix of Romantic and Modern was reflected in every aspect of his playing. No masterpiece then, but an attractive addition to the repertoire, and an ideal coupling for Tippett's more substantial oratorio.



Sunday, 18 March 2012

Total Immersion: Brett Dean Barbican 18 March 2012

Brett Dean is one of the most accomplished and one of the most highly regarded of contemporary composers, so London audiences could feel justified in complaining they don't hear enough of his music. His opera Bliss has yet to reach the London stage (although it's been to Edinburgh), and his Violin Concerto, which is already six years old and is revered as the finest yet of the 21st century, hadn't been played in the UK before this evening.
In fact, we haven't been neglected as much as it seems. In one of the talks that made up today's programme, Dean pointed out that the BBC SO has played more of his music than any other orchestra. And this is the second day of events in the capital dedicated to his music in just over a year – the Wigmore Hall hosted a similar event in 2011 – so on balance we've been well supplied. But the sheer quality of his music, the immediate engagement it invites, and the effortless sophistication in every phrase, is dangerously addictive. Even if we have had our share, the BBC SO are to be thanked for indulging us again, and presenting a range of new perspectives on this ever-unpredictable composer's art.
Dean's music is filled with paradoxes. It always feels contemporary, yet there is little in it, technically speaking, that Hindemith would not recognise. It's powerfully expressive, yet fashionably modern, and atmospheric yet detailed in the extreme. Then there is the question of geographical placement. The composer spent 14 years as a viola player in the Berlin Philharmonic before returning to Australia to compose full time. To my ear, his aesthetic succeeds because it combines everything that is best about central European Modernism with all that is good in the Australian vernacular. So you'll find the wide expanses of Peter Sculthorpe in Dean's orchestral scores, but even here the music is constructed with the harmonic and thematic rigour that you might expect from Rihm, say, or even Ligeti.
The events in the BBC SO's 'Total Immersion' day gave plenty of scope for such reflections. The way these events are formatted these days is that the orchestra gives a big concert at the end of the day, with everything preceding it on a much more modest scale. Considering how much this final event must cost, it is little surprise that economies are made elsewhere. Even so, the nine hours of events that led up to this grand conclusion did feel a bit meagre. There was only one other concert of Dean's music, and even that was given by conservatory students. Also on the programme were two interviews with the composer, a concert of student works inspired by him, and a screening of his opera.
There was a strange sense of deja vu at the first event of the day, a discussion between Brett Dean and Tom Service, for it was Service who hosted the interview slot at the Wigmore Brett Dean day last year. To both men's credit, they managed to avoid repeating themselves, and the only aspect of this event that had taken place at the Wigmore last year was Dean picking up his viola and playing his signature piece Intimate Decisions. This really is a masterpiece, a work for a solo instrument of considerable duration that never feels restricted by its diminutive instrumentation. Like all Dean's music, it is also astonishingly hard, but the ease with which he dispatched the complex figurations demonstrated that his musical gifts are not limited to composition.
The lunchtime concert was given by students from the Guildhall School next door under the composer's baton – yes, he conducts too. The student performers played his music competently, but it was at this point in the day that the technical demands became apparent. But one undoubtedly Australian element of Dean's music is the overt confidence it exudes. Even in the more nebulous and atmospheric passages, this music needs to be presented with surety and panache, and while the Guildhall musicians had all the notes under their fingers, there was a certain sense of poise that the whole concert lacked.
There was some great music here though. Polysomnography is all about sleep (and I wonder what his agent and publisher had to say when he announced that theme for his work). Dean's compositional process tends to be a path from the particular to the abstract. So, in this case, he studies the science of sleep – REM, brain activity patterns, that sort of thing – and uses these as his initial inspiration. But the music that results is so abstract and self-sufficient that the title, which invariably references that initial inspiration, seems far too specific. Another recurring theme is the music of earlier composer's and Wolf-Lieder, a work for soprano and ensemble, mixes quotations from Wolf's songs with Dean's own musical reflections on the composer's fate. Beethoven, Brahms and Gesualdo got a similar treatment in the evening concert. All three cases invited admiration for the sheer compositional skill involved in integrating earlier music seamlessly into a contemporary work. But they also raise the question of why the composer would want to do so, a question he struggled to answer when it was put to him in interview. There were one or two standout performances from the students. Jenavieve Moore sang the Wolf settings well, a little underpowered perhaps, but her German was always clearly articulated. Special mention should also go to the bass trombonist,Oliver Yusuf Narcin, who had his work cut out in Wolf-Lieder, but made an excellent job of it.
Dean's opera Bliss, the most high profile among his many successes to date, desperately needs a good quality DVD release to help it reach the corners of the world that have as yet to see it live – including London. Sadly, the video we saw today isn't it. Instead it is a recording of a live ABC television transmission, with only mediocre sound and visual editing done in real time. To add to this, the screening took place in the appropriately named 'Pit', on a makeshift screen and with an audio system that really wasn't up to the job. It was good to finally see the production, having heard it on Radio 3 from Edinburgh last summer, and the piece is clearly a milestone in the history of opera (not just in Australia), but this pretension did it little justice.
It is a shame that in these financially straightened times, the BBC could only stage one orchestral concert for the day, because Brett Dean's use of the orchestra is what really sets him apart from the crowd. Although many aspects of his music are conventional, his orchestration is always radical and unique. The string section, for example, is never used as a single, homogeneous unit, but divided into smaller sections that interact with astonishing subtlety. And when he writes dense textures, the sheer number of notes he gives the strings turns the pages of their music black, visibly so from the auditorium. His experience as a violist has given Dean a strong grasp of the importance of the middle in orchestral textures. So he'll use the flute in its lower range, for example, or the middle register of the horns, as the basis of expansive mezzo forte textures, which retain their timbral focus thanks to this concentration on the middle.
This was no better demonstrated than in the first work, Testament, for 12 violas. The work reflects on Beethoven's Heiligenstadt Testimony, using various sonic intimations of writing with quill, of deafness, and of Beethoven's own music in the form of a quote from a Razumovsky quartet. Few other composers would have the necessary skill, or even the motivation, to write for such an ensemble, but Dean makes the unusual instrumentation into a musical virtue rather than just a problem to be overcome. Sadly, the Barbican's leaden acoustic worked against every texture, deadening whatever resonance there may have been. An interesting piece though, and it was great to see the composer get his viola out again to join the ranks.
The Violin Concerto that followed was, by a considerable margin, the most accomplished and most significant piece on the day's programme. It is a work for large orchestra and a busy soloist, whose job it is to keep up with the dazzling array of orchestral textures. Dean manages to overcome his obsession with the mid-range to write a solo part that sails across the top of the ensemble. As with his writing for orchestral strings, the solo violin part is dense and continuous, and comparisons have rightly been made with the Sibelius in terms of the sheer physical demands it places on the soloist. Renaud Capuçon gave a typically Romantic reading, with lots of swooping portamento and unashamedly wide vibrato. There is plenty of room in this score for that kind of expression, although I suspect that Frank Peter Zimmermann, for whom the work was written, does the piece more favours with his less flamboyant approach. Just one criticism - there is too much to hear. You can spend five minutes marvelling at the orchestral writing (and playing) and completely miss the fact that the soloist has been playing away the whole time, and articulating a solo line of equal beauty. Repeated listing is definitely in order, so the sooner this work returns to the London stage the better.
Carlo, for strings, choir and I think electronics too, is all about Gesualdo. Knowing that he couldn't, and probably wouldn't want to, ape Gesualdo's style, Dean sets up a duality between Gesualdo's music in the choir and his own in the strings. Anybody who feels frustrated by the few musical responses Stravinsky made to Gesualdo (despite his verbal advocacy) might appreciate this work as the piece Stravinsky never wrote. In fact, Ligeti is a more obvious precedent for the string writing, which is as unstable and unsettling as the motets it accompanies.
The last piece on the programme, Fire Music, was the only real disappointment among the many works presented today. For reasons best known to himself, Dean chose to honour two commissions with the same work, one for the concert hall and one for the ballet, but its the ballet that wins. The inspiration here was the bush fires that raged across South Eastern Australia in 2009, so as you might expect, the results are quite colouristic, even expressionistic. Naturally, the orchestration is fabulous, with groups of off-stage brass, percussion and strings giving the audience the feeling that they are sitting right in the middle to the textures. But apart from these orchestral colours, there is little else going on here. The rigorous approach to themes, harmonies and textures that Dean has inherited from the mid-European Modernists is put on hold, and without it his music lacks linear and structural focus. I could imagine it making a great ballet though, but of course the chances of a choreographed version of the work reaching London are as close to zero as makes no odds.

Monday, 12 March 2012

Giving Out at the Opera: A Masterclass from the Bavarians


The Royal Opera hit the news last week when its new production of Rusalka was jeered and booed from the stalls. Reactions after the event were divided between those (mostly in the right wing press – here's the Telegraph and the Mail) who thought the Regietheater production deserved all it got, and more moderate voices on opera blogs complaining about the audience's behavior.
Paul Kilbey, writing at Culture Wars, has pointed out that the booing, at least during the curtain calls, wasn't half as rowdy as we'd been led to believe. If nothing else, this goes to show that the Brits aren't much good at kicking up a fuss.
Compare and contrast with the opening night of Die Walküre at Bavarian State Opera in Munich yesterday. Act III in this new production from director Andreas Kriegenburg opens with a few minutes of dancing before the music starts. And the audience didn't like it, not one bit. Have a listen to their reaction (the stamping is coming from the stage I think, but I could be wrong):



Friday, 9 March 2012

Igudesman and Joo: A Little Nightmare Music, Cadogan Hall 9 March 2012

If you're in any doubt about the amount of formality and ritual in classical music performances, you should take a look at Igudesman and Joo. About half of their act consists of lampooning what musicians do on stage when they are not actually playing. They make a big deal out of taking the stage, tuning up, engaging with the audience – even the piano lid has comedy potential.
If you haven't guessed yet, this is primarily a slapstick routine. Classical music gives a context for what they do, and the composers of the Classical tradition provide a succession of fall guys, but essentially this is physical humour. That allows the two of them to deflate the pretensions of the classical music world, usually quite blatantly too. The central ingredient to their act is the fact that they can really play their instruments, and each other's as well as they proved in one number. They can also improvise, giving them the edge over most other classical musicians. And they can talk and sing as they play, which given the complexity of some of their acts clearly sets them apart from the musicians who presumably make up most of their audience.
Igudesman and Joo are big on YouTube, and I had seen about half of the sketches before online. But that really doesn't matter – the material isn't the point of the act, it is the performance that makes it funny. And they both have a real skill with audiences, the sort of affinity that elevates the live act well above the internet clip. Playing live may contribute to the development of that kind of skill, but really it is something that only comes from the comedy world, and however good these performers are as musicians, it is their stand-up skills that make the routine work.
Most of the numbers follow a standard format. A classical work is announced, usually Mozart (it's a running gag), but no sooner has it started than some other piece starts to intrude, or some petty dispute between the players erupts, or the piano rebels...you get the idea. Considering the act is aimed at a musically literate audience (I assume), the low-brow nature of the comedy is both surprising and refreshing. When they do mash-ups of classical works and pop songs, the comedy comes from taking the classical composer (and yes, its usually Mozart) down a peg or two.
Fans of the act will be pleased to hear that most of the favourite numbers were included. We got I Will Survive played on the violin with a milk frother instead of a bow. And also Fur Elise karate chopped on the piano. 'Rachmaninov had big hands' (if you've seen it you'll know what I'm referring to) was the centre piece of the second half. There was a great routine with a credit-card-operated piano, and a slightly less amusing one with an extra-terrestrial violin player.
But variety is what makes an evening like this tick along, and on average the quality of the music and the comedy was very high indeed. In the first half, Joo made a remark that this was the pair's London debut. A quip, I thought, but it turned out to be true. How can this be? The pair met in London, when both were young pupils and the Menuhin School. Joo was even born in London. I'm not sure which country it was that fostered their talents (I'm guessing America), but it is a shame that they had to make a name for themselves abroad before the London stage beckoned.
They easily filled the Cadogan Hall, and with a crowd that was as enthusiastic as any I have seen. There was a great moment at the end when the audience gave the pair a standing ovation, to which their response was to sit down on the stage. But it goes to show that there is a huge demand for their brand of humour in the capital. Here's hoping this will be the first of many visits.

Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Stodgy Bach but stunning Vivaldi from Ibragimova and AAM, Wigmore Hall 29 February 2012

Biber, Bach, Vivaldi: Academy of Ancient Music, Alina Ibragimova (violin and director), Wigmore Hall, London 29.2.1
Biber: Passacaglia in G Minor from the Rosary Sonatas
Bach: Sonata in E Major BWV1016
Bach: Concerto in A Minor BWV1041
Vivaldi: Concerto in D Major RV234
Vivaldi: Concerto in D Minor RV565
Biber: Battalia
Bach: Concerto in E Major BWV1042


Alina Ibragimova is often described as a violinist who is equally at home in both modern and period instrument worlds, but it isn't often we get to hear her in Baroque mode. When playing the violin in its modern configuration, she is one of the instrument's finest living exponents. Her tone is slight, but always incisive. Her intonation and phrasing are beyond reproach. And, most significantly, her bowing is agile and light, breathing life and energy into every note she plays.
So how do gut strings and a baroque bow affect these exceptional qualities. Well, that probably comes down to your personal preferences, but to my ear the magic of her playing survives, but is not enhanced by baroque conventions. The baroque bow is a little more cumbersome, and the gradations in her dynamics aren't quite as fine, nor is her forte sound as sweet. But in piano passages her playing is as attractive as ever, and the roundness of the gut string sound adds something of value. The way that she ends long notes is a particular pleasure, when she uses a modern bow, and she makes a real virtue out of long and gradual diminuendos, always precisely controlled and always transfixing. Again, those qualities survive the move to a baroque bow, and as such she offers something genuinely new and interesting to period performance. The question is, does period performance offer anything new or interesting to Alina Ibragimova?
The first piece on the programme, the unaccompanied Passacaglia from Biber's Rosary Sonatas, offered plenty of material for reflection on the subject. Although the movement was written as the conclusion to Biber's great cycle, it is a great way to open a concert, at least it is when played with the verve, passion and musicality that Ibragimova injects. The whole scordatura issue tends to mean that violinists treat Biber as primarily a composer to show off with. Not Ibragimova though. She knows that we know that every note of this music is safely under her fingers. So instead of a bravura show-piece, we are offered a solo movement filled with a wide-ranging colours and textures. And of course, they are the colours and textures of a baroque violin. But all those Ibragimova trademarks are there: the light breezy tone, the sculpted but carefree phrasing, the dynamic shifts that range from the sudden to the very gradual. And that last note was absolute magic; Ibragimova had the capacity audience hanging on the end of her bow as she gradually diminuendoed to a perfectly controlled ending.
The title of the concert was 'Rise of the Concerto', and the programme was apparently curated to demonstrate how the Classical violin concerto evolved out of a diverse array of baroque roots. Or was this just an excuse to programme the best bits of Biber, Vivaldi and Bach's violin music? The three composers, all of whom were violinists themselves, certainly got a good airing, although the performances did more to highlight their differences than their similarities. In the cast of Biber this is little surprise, his music doesn't sound like anybody else's. But Vivaldi and Bach were treated very differently to each other, especially by the Academy of Ancient Music, and there was never any doubt as to which we were hearing at any given time.
Bach was introduced with a sonata for violin and harpsichord, the E major BWV1016. Although not credited as such, harpsichordist Alistair Ross was the real soloist here. His playing never suggested any sense of accompanist's restraint, and his instrument was more than sufficient to fill the Wigmore Hall. The lightness of Ibragimova's tone also allowed the harpsichord to shine through, although she was not shy about adding dynamics into her own part. The limited vibrato in her violin playing, another period performance trait, became clearly apparent here. It is such a shame to hear her playing under to such extreme aesthetic proscriptions, especially when her vibrato is so subtle anyway. But in its (almost) absence, her intonation and articulation showed themselves to be absolutely spot on.
Both halves of the concert ended with Bach concertos, but neither shone in the same way as the Biber or the Vivaldi that they followed. The Academy of Ancient Music fielded a large string section of some 13 players. That's a lot to get on the Wigmore stage, especially with a soloist (admittedly slight), a harpsichord and a theorbo. In the Bach, the sheer quantity of players overwhelmed. There were no problems with the intonation or ensemble, but what should have been sprightly contrapuntal textures sounded heavy and chordal, simply for the number of players. Ibragimova and Ross attempted to compensate with fast tempos and clipped phrases, but to no avail.
More impressive were the Vivaldi concertos, RV234 and 565, which is ironic as they are clearly inferior works. But the lightness of Vivaldi's orchestration, which is all isolated runs and filigree decorations, allowed the ensemble to take flight, despite their numbers. Ibragimova's 'baroque' tone also came into its own in Vivaldi's music, and her famously fluid bowing proved the ideal medium for these Italian solo lines.
Biber made a return in the second half with a comedy number. His Battalia is a depiction of a fight, complete with sound effects and some perambulation around the hall from the violin and cello soloists. This composer is nothing if not unpredictable, and his raucous contribution to the second half was about as far removed from the civility of his earlier Passacaglia as you could imagine.
But fine as the orchestral playing was this evening from the AAM, the best of this concert had already passed by the time they first took the stage. That solo with which Ibragimova opened the concert was a stunner, elevating Biber's fine Passacaglia almost to the status of Bach's famous work in the same genre, of which she is surely one of the greatest exponents. The Academy of Ancient Music achieved an impressive coup getting Ibragimova to tour with them. The trouble is she completely upstaged the lot of them.

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

Osvaldo Golijov treads a fine line between collaboration and plagiarism

Critic Tom Manoff and musicologist Brian McWhorter got a surprise earlier this month when they attended a performance of Osvaldo Golijov's Sidereus given by the Eugene Symphony in Oregon. The two men had recently been editing a recording of Barbeich, a work by composer and accordionist Michael Ward-Bergeman, and the two pieces sounded suspiciously similar. Golijov had acknowledged the use of a theme from Ward-Bergeman's score, but to Manoff and McWhorter's ears he had taken more than that. Manoff later wrote that the plagiarism accounted for over 50% of the score and included 'melodies, harmonies, counterpoint, and notable musical structures.'
Osvaldo Golijov is well known for his collaborative approach to composition, and the popularity of his music stems in no small part from his close interactions with musicians working in popular styles. Ward-Bergeman has been one of his collaborators, and it turns out that both composers are happy with the amount of Barbeich that appears in Sidereus.
So where's the harm? Well, Golijov is a best-selling composer, and his work is of considerable financial benefit to his publishers, Boosey & Hawkes, his agents, Opus3 Artists, and his record label, Nonesuch. None of these organisations are likely to reap the same dividends from a score jointly credited to the lesser-known Ward-Bergeman. And music by, or at least credited to, Golijov doesn't come cheap. The commission for Siderius came from a consortium of 35 American orchestras, each contributing between $1,500 and $4,000, none of whom had any idea about the connections between this and the earlier work. A number of these orchestras are now in the unenviable position of having to defend the composer and the work, but whether they will be returning to him for further commissions remains to be seen.
Any claims to originality for Siderius are also undermined by the fact that Golijov has used the same music before but under a different title. Ward-Bergeman's Barbeich was originally composed as part of a film music project, in which Golijov was also involved. There is no suggestion that Golijov played any part in the creation of Barbeich, but he did make an orchestration of it called Patagonia, which was performed in concert by members of the Chicago Symphony in March 2010.
Since the story began making headlines in the States last week, another instance of questionable attribution on Golijov's part has come to light. After posting his comments, Manoff was contacted by Lúcia Guimarães, a Brazilian journalist based in New York, to tell of a similar experience. She had attended a performance of Kohelet, written by Golijov for the St. Lawrence String Quartet. But one of the movements sounded very familiar, as a popular song by a Brazilian composer. Guimarães knows the Brazilian composer personally, and has been discrete in not naming the allegedly copied work. But she contacted Golijov himself, who apologised and withdrew the movement.
Some commentators, including Alex Ross, have suggested comparisons with Baroque composers as a defence for Golijov's actions. After all, both Bach and Handel routinely passed off other composers' works as their own. But, as Ross himself points out, Golijov's increasing reliance on the work of others parallels a significant decline in both the quality and quantity of his output. Sidereus, for example, is significantly shorter than its commission stipulated. He has also been having trouble meeting deadlines, and the Los Angeles Philharmonic had to cancel the high-profile première of his Violin Concerto last May as the score was not ready.
All of which stands in stark contrast to Golijov's works of a decade ago, when music like La Pasión según San Marcos and Ainadamar established him as a major new voice in classical music. As a result of those imaginative and popular scores, the credit 'by Osvaldo Golijov' still carries a significant financial premium. If it is to continue to do so, the composer himself needs to define precisely what those words mean.

More articles on this story:

Sunday, 19 February 2012

Newspapers Inciting Performance Disruptions

The Death of Klinghoffer is a controversial opera. Protests of one sort or another accompany every production. But just to make sure that any potential protesters are aware of the upcoming staging at English National Opera, the Telegraph's Roya Nikkhah has contacted a range of interested parties to let them know.
The resulting article opens with the line 'the English National Opera (ENO) is to risk public protests with a new production of The Death of Klinghoffer.' Such protests are all the more likely as a result of the article that follows. It's not inflammatory as such, but it does detail all the reasons why anybody who did want to protest at the Coliseum might do so.
The Telegraph clearly isn't going to be too distressed if, or rather when, such protests do happen. However, if the protests go as far as disrupting the performances, then audience members, whatever their personal politics, are unlikely to be so impressed. The classical music community tends towards the view that protests outside or inside a venue are acceptable, so long as the performance itself is not disrupted. And while this could be read as a narrow-minded defence of their cherished medium, a more important issue is the fact that if audiences are denied the chance of hearing the music in question, the debate surrounding it becomes limited to the competing ideologies, and the music itself is denied its voice in the debate.
None of which is apparently of any concern to the Telegraph, for whom protests and disruptions will always make for news stories (at least while they are still rare enough to be news). But it's not just the Telegraph, the Guardian attempted a similar stunt, on behalf of the other side of the Israel/Palestine debate, last September. Charlotte Higgins wrote a piece about the suspension of four players by the LPO over their signing a letter opposing the invitation of the Israel Philharmonic to the Proms. The timing for the LPO was dreadful, as the furore erupted in the week leading up to the opening concert of their winter season. Higgins was clearly expecting disruption at the event, and, like Nikkhah, went some way towards fomenting it with the line 'The LPO plays its season opener at London's Southbank Centre tonight: if it is disrupted by protests, the orchestra will have only itself to blame.' Notice how clearly the venue for the event is stated, presumably for the benefit of any potential protesters who don't usually go to LPO concerts.
I was at the concert myself, and was surprised to see Charlotte Higgins there. It was the first (and so far last) time I'd ever seen her at a concert, and I could only deduce she was there to see what sort of disruption her article had caused.
Fortunately the event went without a hitch. But had there been disruption, the Guardian would have been at least partly to blame. Given that protests are almost inevitable at the ENO Klinghoffer, questions should be raised about the Telegraph's role in any performance disruptions that do occur. Perhaps Lord Leveson would favour us with his views on the subject?