Wednesday, 30 September 2015

Lebrecht, Sokolov…and Sokolov’s wife



Grigory Sokolov’s refusal of the Cremona Award, on account its having previously been presented to Norman Lebrecht, has generated much debate about the cause of their antagonism. Some have speculated that it’s a result of a blogpost Lebrecht wrote in 2013 questioning Sokolov’s greatness on the curious grounds of his not being willing to perform in the UK. But a reply to my previouspost on this story, from one ‘ADGO’, points to a more compelling reason. Here is the message in full:

“As Lebrecht refused to post my comment on his blog Slippedisc, I will copy-paste it here for all to read. He cannot bury his shameless actions forever.

Recall last year that soon after Sokolov's wife passed away, the pianist published a cryptic letter which began, 'To my astonishment, I have learned about some delirious inventions made on the subject of my wife's life'. This can be read in full on Sokolov's website or on AMC. The cause of that was most likely Norman Lebrecht's blog post in which he speculated about Sokolov marrying his dead cousin's wife, going into detail about the apparent Sokolov family tree. You can find this blog post still on Slippedisc, and the links at the bottom of it which lead to the old Sokolov website. Click any of those links and you'll see a message which states that Norman Lebrecht should not be believed. Lebrecht's rash and shameless speculation about Sokolov's recently deceased wife is most likely the reason why Sokolov refuses to associate with him. I want to make this clear as it is the only sensible public explanation for Sokolov's refusal. There may be private reasons no one can know about, but the public one is there for all to see.

On another matter....I've attended Sokolov's recitals for nearly 15 years and he is without doubt the greatest pianist I've ever heard. If you can't hear him in the UK--which I used to--then take a trip to Brussels or Amsterdam and it'll most likely turn into one of the great concert experiences of your life.”


And Sokolov’s response here: http://www.rogev.com/berner/122.htm
 
As the earlier version of Lebrecht’s post on Sokolov’s site shows, “his wife was also his cousin’s widow” originally read “his wife was also his aunt”, a more lurid claim and, as it turns out, a false one. Lebrecht could probably have avoided this whole incident if he had issued an acknowledged correction and an apology, rather than the “update” we get instead. But, of course, that’s not how Lebrecht works.

2 comments:

  1. Spark Sports is apparently engaging in the sinister new phenomenon of spoofspam — the art of putting out a message that appears to be an utterly irrelevant commercial promotion -- when it's really a hurtful below-the-belt attack on the subjects of the story where perpetrator deposits his poison-tipped comment. The transgender substitute quarterback of the Ravens has been spotted cavorting with all four of Norman Lebrecht's daughters in a wooded waterfront park on the outskirts of Baltimore. Video proof is said to be entangled in legal issues, but is expected to be both conclusive and explosive if/when it's revealed to the media. Grigory Sokolov, who owns a 2.5% stake in the Ravens team through his late wife's estate, is suspected of encouraging this behavior in revenge for accusations of bloodless incest (the worst kind, according to the rabbis associated with Mr Sokolov's father's bizarre neo-Hasidic sect).

    ReplyDelete
  2. On wiki it said it was because he is protesting the UKs need for fingerprints and eye print for non EU and that sokolov said it reminded him of the Soviet union

    ReplyDelete